this is the -- their reports interrupted president obama during a speech. we know where they're coming from. so the fact that they have two anonymous sources that are saying this has to be suspect. now, if it was another legitimate news organization that didn't have this kind of bent, it would be a different story. >> what about as we just saw, when the senator himself denies it on camera to cnn, does that not open the door for other organizations to cover it? >> you can cover it after he says that as cnn did. a great question by dana. good for her for getting the interview, for raising a prickly topic. but to go on the record talking about whether or not he had been with prostitutes before he even addresses it with two anonymous sources, isn't this program called "reliable sources"? isn't this what journalists do is not run anonymous sources? >> because we're reliable, we asked the daily caller for a response. they did not release their names and they obscured their faces. it is difficult and, inform, axe and "the new york times" say they have investigated